GWAS/WGS Meta-Analysis and ME/CFS Genetic Studies
1 Maccallini 2026 — Biological Insights from GWAS and WGS of ME/CFS
Key Findings::
- Meta-GWAS and post-GWAS analysis of 19,470 ME/CFS cases
- Brain tissue enrichment, glutamatergic synapse involvement, specific neuronal cell types
- Integrates DecodeME, MVP, and UK Biobank summary statistics
- Post-GWAS analyses (LDSC, MAGMA, FUMA) point to CNS-specific mechanisms
Conclusion:: Largest ME/CFS meta-GWAS to date; provides converging evidence for brain-based genetic architecture. Limitations:: Preprint; not yet peer-reviewed; methodology sound but unvalidated. Certainty:: 0.45
2 DecodeME Consortium 2025 — Initial GWAS Findings
(DecodeME Consortium, Ponting, et al. 2025)
Key Findings::
- 8 genome-wide significant loci in up to 15,579 cases, 259,909 controls
- Three loci near infection-response genes (BTN2A2, OLFM4, RABGAP1L)
- Four of eight replicated in UK Biobank/Lifelines
- CA10 colocalises with multisite chronic pain
- No shared causal variants with depression or anxiety
Conclusion:: Both immunological and neurological processes involved in ME/CFS genetic risk. Limitations:: Preprint; European ancestry only; fine-mapping not conclusive for causal genes. Certainty:: 0.60
3 Sardell et al. 2026 — Combinatorial Genetic Risk Factors in DecodeME
Key Findings::
- Reproducible combinatorial genetic risk factors across DecodeME and independent cohorts
- Synergistic SNP interactions not detectable by standard GWAS
- Shared genetic architecture across ME/CFS and comorbidities
Conclusion:: Combinatorial analytics reveal additional genetic risk architecture invisible to conventional GWAS. Limitations:: Proprietary PrecisionLife platform; independent replication needed. Certainty:: 0.55
4 Birch et al. 2025 — Rare Monogenic Variation in ME/CFS
Key Findings::
- Rare monogenic variation contributes to ME/CFS genetic architecture
- Complements common variant GWAS findings
- Identifies rare variant burden in neurological and immune pathways
Conclusion:: Precision genomics approach reveals rare variation contribution. Limitations:: Limited sample size for rare variant analysis; single study. Certainty:: 0.50
5 Huang et al. 2026 — Metabolite GWAS in ME/CFS
Key Findings::
- GWAS on plasma biomarker levels in ME/CFS patients (UK Biobank)
- Genetic susceptibility toward a specific metabolic phenotype
- Identifies variants linking metabolic perturbations to ME/CFS risk
Conclusion:: Genetic basis for metabolic phenotype in ME/CFS. Limitations:: UK Biobank case definition; metabolic proxy not direct ME/CFS measure. Certainty:: 0.55
7 Hirsch et al. 2025 — Comparative GWAS (PTLDS, FM, ME/CFS)
Key Findings::
- Compared genetic architecture across post-Lyme, FM, and ME/CFS
- Identifies shared and distinct genetic factors
Conclusion:: Cross-condition GWAS reveals condition-specific and shared loci. Limitations:: Small sample sizes for PTLDS subgroup. Certainty:: 0.50
8 Duan et al. 2025 — Mendelian Randomization: Immune Cells → ME/CFS
Key Findings::
- MR supports causal role for specific immune cell types in ME/CFS
- Inflammatory cytokines identified as mediators
Conclusion:: Genetically predicted immune profiles causally influence ME/CFS risk. Limitations:: MR assumptions; pleiotropy; modest effect sizes. Certainty:: 0.50
9 Wirth & Scheibenbogen 2026 — Glutamatergic/GABAergic Imbalance in ME/CFS
(Wirth and Scheibenbogen 2026)
Key Findings::
- ME/CFS and post-COVID share excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmitter imbalance
- "Wired but tired" explained by glutamatergic excess / GABAergic deficit
- Integrates genetic findings pointing to glutamatergic synapse
Conclusion:: Neurotransmitter imbalance provides mechanistic link between genetic findings and symptoms. Limitations:: Review paper; synthesizes existing evidence rather than new data. Certainty:: 0.55
10 Hajdarevic et al. 2022 — Genetic Association Study (n=2,532)
Key Findings::
- Largest published GWAS at the time (2,532 cases)
- Several potential risk loci identified
- No genome-wide significant loci
Conclusion:: Underpowered for GWAS; highlights need for larger samples. Limitations:: Below genome-wide significance threshold. Certainty:: 0.55
11 Schlauch et al. 2016 — First ME/CFS GWAS
Key Findings::
- 442 SNPs identified as candidate associations
- First published ME/CFS GWAS
- No genome-wide significant loci
Conclusion:: Pioneering study; establishes feasibility of GWAS in ME/CFS. Limitations:: Severely underpowered by modern standards. Certainty:: 0.40
12 Ueland et al. 2022 — Failed Replication of TRA Locus
Key Findings::
- Failed to replicate previously reported TRA locus association
- Important negative control for the field
Conclusion:: TRA locus finding likely false positive; field needs rigorous replication standards. Limitations:: Single replication study; different population. Certainty:: 0.60
13 Dibble et al. 2020 — Critical Review of ME/CFS Genetics
(Dibble, McGrath, and Ponting 2020)
Key Findings::
- Comprehensive review of heritability and genetic risk factors
- Documents small sample sizes and lack of replication
- Calls for adequately powered GWAS (subsequently addressed by DecodeME)
Conclusion:: Heritable component established; specific loci elusive pre-DecodeME. Limitations:: Review paper; no new data. Certainty:: 0.70
14 Song et al. 2025 — MDD-ME/CFS Mendelian Randomization
Key Findings::
- Two-sample MR investigating MDD-ME/CFS causal relationship
- Complements DecodeME finding of no shared causal variants
Conclusion:: Genetic evidence does not support causal MDD→ME/CFS pathway. Limitations:: MR assumptions; GWAS summary statistic limitations. Certainty:: 0.50
15 Das et al. 2022 — Combinatorial Analysis (UK Biobank)
Key Findings::
- GWAS + PrecisionLife combinatorial analytics on UK Biobank
- Identified genetic risk factors missed by conventional GWAS
- Synergistic SNP-SNP interactions
Conclusion:: Combinatorial approaches complement standard GWAS. Limitations:: Proprietary platform; replication needed. Certainty:: 0.55
16 Frank et al. 2026 — Molecular Reclassification of ME/CFS
Key Findings::
- Integrates multi-omics, machine learning, and precision medicine
- Toward molecular reclassification of ME/CFS subtypes
Conclusion:: Multi-omics integration can redefine ME/CFS classification. Limitations:: Review/hypothesis paper; requires empirical validation. Certainty:: 0.45